The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (a fine of 1.5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant's wrong recognition of the judgment, the act of transferring the means of access, such as the crime in this case, is against the security and reliability of electronic financial transactions, the act of using the means of access as a very important means of crime in various crimes, such as Bosping, illegal gambling, money laundering, etc., is considerably significant, and the problem is widely recognized in society since the means of access provided as such is so-called the so-called passbook. The defendant seems to have been sufficiently predicted that the means of access provided can be used for the crime. In addition, considering all of the defendant's age, character, character, environment, circumstances of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is judged to be appropriate and it is too unreasonable, and the defendant's above assertion is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.