The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized his mistake, the act of transferring the means of access, as in this case, is not only prejudicial to the security and reliability of electronic financial transactions, but also has a significant adverse impact on society by using it as a very important means of crime in various crimes, such as singing, illegal gambling, money laundering, etc., and the means of access so provided is called so-called the so-called passbook where its problems are widely recognized, and the Defendant seems to have sufficiently predicted that the means of access provided by himself can be used for the crime. In addition, considering all of the following factors, considering the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, circumstances of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be excessively unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.