1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,81,448 to the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from February 1, 2013 to June 19, 2015.

(DCONNING/WX1) and 2nd construction [each WALK WAL YG MIN S/WX 1] Crest up to 10, 70% of the construction premium, 10% of the total construction premium, 30% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 10% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 20% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 30% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 30% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 50% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction cost of the instant case* 50% of the total construction premium, 17% of the total construction cost of the instant case* 19.7% of the total construction premium, 2019% of direct labor cost

D. On August 23, 2012, the Defendant, through the employee A in charge of the instant construction, concluded that the Plaintiff at the meeting of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff “in the event that the contract quantity increases or decreases by at least 5% based on the cable quantity used in the instant construction, the full amount of the contract amount will be settled.”

In addition, the defendant decided to consider the 10% law rate in calculating the cable quantity of the construction of this case.

E. The comparison of the cable quantity agreed in the instant construction contract and the cable quantity constructed in the instant construction project with the 10% law applicable to the cable quantity (hereinafter “settlement standard quantity”) is as listed in the following table.

Standards for the settlement of separately agreed quantities.