logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.12 2015나551
임금
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant: (a) KRW 2,015,00 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); and (b) KRW 540,000 to the Appointed B.

Reasons

1. On April 12, 2012, the Defendant, a company conducting a basic fact-finding construction business, was awarded a contract for reinforced concrete construction work (hereinafter “the instant aggregate construction work”) from Suwon-gun, Suwon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, by setting the construction cost of KRW 124,00,000, and the construction period of KRW 124,000,00, and from April 16, 2012 to June 30, 2012.

【Reasons for Recognition】 Entry of No. 2-1 of evidence No. 2-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties were employed by the Defendant and did not receive wages for each of the following periods at the site of the instant framework construction work. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff and the designated parties for delay damages under the Labor Standards Act from the 14th anniversary of the termination date of labor relations. From April 20, 2012 to May 12, 2012, 200 Appointers B from April 29, 2012 to May 12, 2012, the Plaintiff and the designated parties were jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff’s wages to the Plaintiff and the subcontractor from April 20, 200 to May 20, 2012 to the 540,000 Appointers C from April 20 to May 9, 2012 to May 9, 2012, the Defendant is not jointly and severally obligated to receive wages from the Plaintiff and the designated parties from the subcontractor.

B. The Defendant alleged that the construction portion among the instant structural construction works was subcontracted to E in KRW 25,00,000, and paid KRW 12,000,000 as personnel expenses. Although E performed a part of the structural construction works, it is anticipated that KRW 4,474,400 will be required to repair defects due to the defective construction works. Thus, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff are expected to be required.

arrow