The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On March 1, 2016, from around 05:30 to around 05:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) on the front line of “C” located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu; (b) the victim D (44 tax) who is a taxi driver, who wants to board a taxi, is holding a large number of foreign materials on the clothes of the body, such as the mouth, breast, head, and head, and (c) the Defendant would not drive the taxi on the ground of any trouble in the business due to smelling; and (b) the Defendant would not drive the taxi on the front line of “C” located in Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul; and (d) whether the Defendant would refuse to board the taxi at present, taking a video image of the victim and the taxi with the cell phone regardless of the detention of the victim;

domestic broadcasting station shall be set aside.

It is spreading to broadcasting stations and the Internet.

As a reporter, the Party did not get a taxi for 30 minutes from the paper to the end of the broadcast. The Party, “I am a taxi,” and “I am a taxi for 30 minutes from the paper.”

Man-hee said that it would not be frightened, and made intimidation by taking advantage of the frightenness.

2. The public prosecution against the above-mentioned offense shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 283 (1) of the same Act.

According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim has withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant prosecution.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.