Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

A or B fails to pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1) Defendant A is a recipient of unemployment benefits in office, and Defendant B is a person who is in charge of accounting affairs in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and Defendant C is a corporation registered with the purpose of waterproof Construction Business on October 10, 2013, Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

A. On the grounds of fraud and violation of the Insurance Act (the supply of unemployment benefits), Defendant A could not receive unemployment benefits, etc. by fraud or other improper means, and the Defendant, from October 2014 to April 2016, even if he/she did not work at the site of “E,” located in the third class city of Sejong Special Metropolitan City for the settlement of accounts,” he/she would be presumed to have worked during the said period, and the Defendant, on May 19, 2016, applied for unemployment benefits to the staff of the employment center of Daejeon Special Metropolitan City Employment and Management Agency for unemployment benefits for four times until August 23, 2016, denied unemployment benefits of KRW 3,907,410.

Accordingly, the defendant received employment insurance money by fraud and acquired it by fraud.

B. Fraud. Defendant B, at the same time and place as the above “A”, entered Defendant A into a field employee in the employment insurance system of the Ministry of Labor (the details of labor) as if he/she had worked in the absence of having worked daily at the employment-related construction site, etc., at the same time and place as the above “A”. On May 19, 2016, Defendant A filed an application for eligibility for unemployment benefits with a staff member of the Daejeon Regional Employment Agency for the unemployment benefits with the employees of the Daejeon Regional Employment Agency, and subsequently, the Defendant A received the unemployment benefits of KRW 3,907,410 on four occasions until August 23, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant illegally assisted the supply of unemployment benefits.

(c)

3) Defendant B violated the above provisions in relation to Defendant B’s business at the same time and at the same place as the above “B”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Requesting a person suspected of fraudulent receipt of unemployment benefits, requesting investigation, detailed statement of supply and demand, and applying statutes on transactions;

1. Criminal facts;