beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 39,823,815 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 18, 2016 to January 10, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for A14 tons of truck A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a motor vehicle insurance contract for B25 tons of motor vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
B. The driver of the Defendant’s vehicle (one vehicle on the traffic accident report No. 7-1 of the Evidence A) (one vehicle on January 14, 2013), when the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle (one vehicle on the traffic accident report No. 7-1 of the Defendant’s Evidence A), was under the influence of two-lanes of the two-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the audience at the point of 289.6km in the middle line on the Highway located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North Korea. (hereinafter “two-lane”) in the direction of Seoul.
ii) A D vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “three-lane”) which led to the Defendant’s vehicle stopping in the direction of a large angle of the two-lanes and one-lanes on the said expressway, led to the said accident, was driven by the Defendant vehicle, leaving the vehicle rapidly, avoiding the collision with the previous Defendant vehicle, but following the vehicle driven by the latter (hereinafter referred to as “four-lane”) led to the shock of three-lanes on the rear side of the vehicle, and 3 vehicles shock the rear side of the vehicle loaded on the Defendant vehicle.
(iii) the rear F vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “five vehicle”)
(i)The front door part of the Defendant vehicle which was stopped in the direction of the crossing line of the road was shocked with the front part of five vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “instant first shock”).
4) The G vehicle, H vehicle (hereinafter “7 vehicle”), and I vehicle (hereinafter “8 vehicle”) followed by the foregoing preceding chain-related drilling accident were stopped on the road.
5) However, the Plaintiff’s vehicle proceeding behind the vehicle (the “nine-lane” vehicle in the traffic accident report) is changed to the first lane in order to avoid the foregoing vehicles which were stopped while driving in the said two-lane.