A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at latest at night or at the new wall time, thought that the operators of the D active fish sales center in the East Sea, in the East Sea, have stolen the fishes in the water tank.

1. Around 02:10 on February 13, 2015, the Defendant intruded into the D active fish sales center in the East Sea via a entrance that was not corrected at the D active fish sales center in the East Sea C, and then placed in the “F store operated by the victim E” store in the “F store operated by the victim E, which was the victim’s holding market value at the same time, in advance, 400,000 won of the total market value of the victim’s ownership, and stolen it.

2. The Defendant intruded into the above active fish sales center in the same time and manner as the above Paragraph (1), and placed the victim G in the “H” store operated by the victim G, and placed the victim’s “H” store into the vinyl 1,50,000 won in advance and stolen the victim’s market price, which was 2,50,000 won.

3. On March 5, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant intruded into the said active fish sales center by the same method, and then placed it in the “F store operated by the victim E,” in the “F store operated by the victim E, and placed it in a vinyl paper prepared in advance at the market price of 100,000,000 won, which is the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (up to concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed by night structure intrusion larceny on February 13, 2015, with regard to victim E with the largest offense), among concurrent crimes, the fact that the defendant reflects the crime, and that the victim agreed with the victim, etc. are favorable factors for sentencing, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of probation after having been sentenced to two years of the suspended sentence for 8 months on July 22, 2014.

These factors of sentencing.