logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.15 2015가단5173250
양수금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor KRW 36,185,284 as well as the full payment from January 7, 2016.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a)the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and each of the reasons for participation;

(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').

Judgment on Confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. As the Plaintiff’s determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim did not have the right by transferring the Plaintiff’s claim to the Defendants while continuing the instant lawsuit (on August 31, 2015, to the City Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd., and the City Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd., to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff on October 8, 2015), the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.

arrow