beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B were sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on February 14, 2020, respectively, and the judgment was finalized on May 28, 2020, and Defendant C was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on February 14, 2020 for the same offense in the same court on February 14, 2020, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 22, 2020.
On March 2017, the Defendants: (a) carried the trademarks in China into the Republic of Korea; (b) carried them into the Republic of Korea; and (c) sold them as if they were imported as authentic goods in the Internet open market; (b) Defendant A carried the forged goods into the Republic of Korea; (c) Defendant B sold counterfeit goods in the Internet open market; and (d) Defendant C is aware of the duties of packaging and delivering counterfeit goods.
Accordingly, on March 16, 2017, the Defendants made up the F building and G office in Daegu Northern-gu, and posted an article stating that the Defendants registered the seller in the name of “H” on the Internet Open Market “H,” and sold the authentic goods D and E at low prices.
Defendants, in collusion on October 1, 2017, posted by the Defendants as “I” the said seller at the above office as “I,” and sell good D and E items;
100% refunded dynasium, which is not a good.
The victim J, who reported and contacted the sales writing to the purport that "D and E sell the new fry with a trademark registered in the Republic of Korea, using 77,00 won which he/she had forged and affixed a trademark registered in the Republic of Korea, and sold it by using her frying as well as selling it from April 9, 2018 through 2,761 times in total as shown in the separate crime list from that to April 9, 2018, selling a total of 157,757,700 won, such as a new fry with a trademark forged and affixed, thereby infringing D and E owner's trademark right, and selling each buyer listed in the crime list as if he/she was a fying product, and then selling it as if he/she had the forged new fying, and then selling it in sum 157,757,700 won from the victim's 2,761.