logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.02.06 2019고단7675
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence No. 5 shall be confiscated.

The defendant is guilty.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] The scaming organization, which is managed by the general responsibility in the name of the defendant, will provide a loan by calling to an unspecified number of victims.

or misrepresentation of an investigative agency;

It is an international criminal organization consisting of inducements by deceiving victims due to the abduction of their family members, solicitations that invite victims to receive damage money, deliverys of the means of access connected to the large account, withdrawals of damage money through the delivery of the said means of access, and withdrawals of remittance of damage money to the said organization.

On October 2019, the Defendant accepted the proposal that “If the Defendant, who received cash delivery from the persons who redeem the principal and interest of the loan to operate the lending company, transfers the account without passbook to the designated account, the Defendant would pay KRW 300,000 per day, and KRW 50,000 per remittance as remuneration,” from the person under whose name the Defendant used the name was using the Kakakao Kakao Kadi “D,” which reported and contacted the job offer advertisements in the C newspaper.

However, the defendant had experience in cash collection and remittance of bankbooks without passbook prior to all, and could have known that the defendant's act of collecting cash and remitting without passbooks can be used for the delivery of the amount of damage caused by Bophishing. Also, the defendant asked the defendant to the effect that his own suspicion is not illegal, and that his act is not illegal.

In addition, the Defendant only exchanged with the above person in the name of the deceased, and the loan company operated by the person in the name of the deceased did not at all confirm whether the loan company actually exists, where the person in the name of the D actually worked, and where the person in the name of the deceased, etc. did not talk with the person in the name of the deceased, and when remitting the passbook without a passbook, the Defendant is instructed to receive the resident registration number in the name of another person.

arrow