Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years;
2. Seven mobile phone calls seized (Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office, 2016).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, “2016 Highest 196,” in connection with the organization of international telephone financing fraud (U.S.) in which the Defendant was acting in China, etc., conspired with the employees of phishing, B, C, D, E, and E, to acquire money from many unspecified people in Korea, by acquiring money from a large number of people in Korea, by means of an organization, such as an account to receive money from the Republic of Korea and a solicitation order to invite withdrawal of the transferred money, a total amount of withdrawal order ordering the withdrawal of the transferred money, a cash withdrawal order from a financial institution according to its instruction, a total amount of withdrawal order received from a financial institution, a cash withdrawal order received from a cash withdrawal order, or a remittance order delivered from a telephone financing organization in China.
The Defendant, upon receiving the direction of “F” in the name of “F,” which is the cause of the host organization in China, sent a cell phone text message to many and unspecified persons “for sports soil exchange staff. 100,000 won per day’s basic daily day,” and conspired to recruit access media and distribute one access medium to the Defendant, etc. using passbooks and physical cards and other electronic financial transactions access media (hereinafter “Access media”), by transfer to the subscribers through Kwikset and Kwikset services.
In addition, the Defendant, under the direction of "F", and together with B, C, and D, transferred the money obtained by deceiving many unspecified domestic victims to the large account that was collected in such a way, the Defendant withdrawn the amount of damage and made the money remitted to the account of the operator of the telephone financial fraud organization to the overseas account. B received 5% of the amount of the withdrawal, and the Defendant, C, etc. conspired to distribute 3% of them.
1. The Defendant’s fraud, as mentioned above, is the Defendant’s nameless phishing books, B, C, D, and E.