A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 절도 피고인은 2015. 10. 7. 10:36경 안산시 단원구 원곡로 28, ‘중국은행 안산지점’ 앞 노상에서, 피해자 C가 주차해 놓은 D 싼타페 차량이 시정되어 있지 않은 것을 발견하고 위 차량 조수석 문을 열고 차량 안에 있던 피해자 소유의 시가 27만 원 상당의 토리버치 분홍색 가방 1개와 시가 27만 원 상당의 토리버치 검은 색 숄드백 지갑 1개, 위 지갑 안에 보관되어 있던 시가 200만 원 상당의 순금팔찌 1개, 시가 45만 원 상당의 순금팔찌 1개, 시가 24만 원 상당의 14K 백금반지 1개, 현금 6만 원 등 합계 329만 원 상당의 재물을 가져가 절취하였다.

2. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant attempted to larceny money and valuables kept in a feling vehicle parked by the victim E at the above place on October 7, 2015, and was in favor of the head hand of the feling vehicle. However, the Defendant failed to perform his/her attempt because the vehicle’s door was corrected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of seizure records and list statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the reason for the sentencing of Article 60(3) of the Juvenile Act [the scope of recommending punishment] , since the criteria for the treatment of multiple crimes in the special mitigation area of category II (general larceny) for general property are concurrent crimes between crimes for which the sentencing criteria are not set, the lower limit is based on the lower limit of the crime for which the sentencing guidelines are set [the decision of sentencing] (the decision of sentencing] unfavorable: The defendant does not return home without returning home after release from the juvenile reformatory, and reaches favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case: The defendant is against the wrongness, and the victim of larceny and the victim of larceny.