A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) leased No. 201 in Jinjin-si building B; (b) employed a sexual traffic woman C; (c) read and contacted sexual traffic-related writing posted by the Defendant through the string Dock D, “D,” and (d) received 1.60,000 won in compensation for sexual traffic; (b) had C have sexual intercourse with the male purchase; (c) thereafter, 1.1 billion won out of the 1.60,000 won received from the sexual buyers, and (d) arranged sexual traffic between C and 12, from February 17, 2017 to around February 19, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning on-site photographs and studio lease agreements;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. In the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the Mediation, etc. of Additional Collection: The criminal act of this case was committed again despite the fact that there was the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the commission of sexual traffic through the Internet, and the commission of sexual traffic and the commission of sexual traffic in order to avoid crackdown: The period of crime is short, the crime is against the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the order.