logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.10.23 2019고단3813
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2019, at around 05:20, the Defendant assaulted the victim E (the aged 51) and the victim F (the aged 31) who was called up on the front side of the Busan B apartment C-dong, with the report of 112, for the following reasons: (a) the victim E (the aged 51) and the victim F (the aged 31) who was under the jurisdiction of the Busan Urban Police Station D district unit; and (b) the victim f (the aged 31) was breading the Defendant, and recommended the Defendant to return home, and then the victim ebbbbbbbbbbbbbs of the victim, walking the fbbbbbbbbbbs, and then dried the victim f

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in the 112 Report Report Case, and at the same time, the victim F requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of police statement to F and E;

1. Photographs of victims;

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., favorable circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing) is [the scope of recommendation] the basic area (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 6-1 year and April) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 6-1 year and April) (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da1488, Apr. 2, 2007). The sentence is determined as the order by taking into account all the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, which are the conditions for the sentencing of

arrow