logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 3. 22. 선고 83도232 판결
[사기][공1983.5.15.(704),780]
Main Issues

If the number of days pending trial of lower courts exceeds the period of principal punishment, the non-Inclusion of days pending trial

Summary of Judgment

Where the total number of days of detention exceeds the term of punishment for the original sentence at the time of the sentence of the original judgment, the number of days of detention after appeal shall not

[Reference Provisions]

Article 57 of the Criminal Act, Article 482 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 76Do3056 Decided October 29, 1976

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 82No1193 delivered on December 31, 1982

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the appeal was filed in order to wait for the stay of execution set forth in the final judgment which was pronounced guilty prior to the judgment of conviction, but that point is not a legitimate ground of appeal, so the appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

In addition, according to the records, since the number of days of pre-trial detention by means of finance, finance and statutory inclusion exceeds the term of the original sentence, the number of days of pre-trial detention after the appeal shall not be aggregated.

This decision is delivered with the assent of all participating judges, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Justices Jeon Soo-hee (Presiding Justice)

arrow