All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) although the Defendants were guilty of the facts charged in this case, although they did not interfere with the operation of the construction vehicle by blocking the main entrance of the construction site by body and obstructing the operation of the construction vehicle and suspending construction, as stated in the facts charged in this case, they did not interfere with the construction work of the victim, the lower court convicted him

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court: (a) discontinued construction works at the main entrance of the construction site at the main entrance of the said construction site and interfered with the operation of the construction vehicle to enter the said construction site on the grounds that the victim FF corporation incurred noise and dust while constructing a new building in the Goyang-dong-dong-gu from February 7, 201 to 16:00 on the same day; (b) from March 5, 201 to March 07:35, 201, Defendant C suspended construction at the main entrance of the said construction site and interfered with the operation of the construction vehicle to enter the said construction site for the same reason; and (c) therefore, the Defendants’ aforementioned assertion is without merit.

[A] Some of the residents at the domicile where the defendants are living in the above construction site who filed an application for temporary injunction for the suspension of construction against the victim company (Seoul District Court 2011Kahap1999, the above court held that the above residents, the applicant company, have the right to seek the full suspension of the construction of a factory against the victim company, and it is difficult to recognize that there is a need to preserve the victim company's right to seek the full suspension of the construction of a factory. However, it cannot be readily concluded that there is no possibility that noise is generated beyond the limit of admission in the victim company's carrying out the construction work at the above construction site, and the victim company should not proceed with the construction exceeding