beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On March 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 17:11, the facts charged in the instant case: (b) around 404, the Defendant reported the victim to the police by the Defendant’s father E and the victim F (the age of 61) before several days; (c) reported the victim to the police; and (d) the victim and the victim complained of the dispute on the ground that the victim claimed against the above E, the victim obstructed the defect that the victim tried to board the vehicle; (d) opened the vehicle in his car; (e) opened the vehicle in his car; (e) opened the vehicle in his car; (e) opened the vehicle in his car; and (e) opened the vehicle in his car in his car; and (e) opened the car in his car in his car; and (e) made the victim who gets the driver’s seat on the vehicle in his car, the Defendant did so with the part of the victim who gets the driver’s seat on the road, thereby causing damage to the victim’s hair and the window.
2. The judgment shall be impartial and impartial.
In light of the prosecutor's facts charged and various differences, contradictions, and questions presented in support of the prosecutor's facts charged, and rather, the defendant's assertion and evidence are not an attitude to take criminal court to demand strict certification on the premise of incompetence.
The court in charge of a criminal trial shall hear the arguments of both the prosecutor and the defendant, and examine the evidence in the process of the trial, based on the results, and make a decision on whether the crime has been committed in accordance with the presumption of innocence, which is the principle of the criminal trial required under the Constitution.
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do16628, May 13, 201). The instant case pertains to the discovery of disagreements and doubtss between “F’s statement”, which is the core evidence that seems consistent with the facts charged, and “the CCTV video at the site of the instant case,” which is an objective evidence.
First, the F’s statements are written.