logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.07.25 2019고단1900
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B high-priced vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act;

On January 9, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on January 20, 2019, and proceeded at a 33-lane 29 at the Gyeong-si in the Gyeong-si in the Gyeongsan-si.

Since there is no signal and no separate traffic control is carried out, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether there is a cross-road vehicle by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping the vehicle for the driver of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the defendant's failure to proceed directly as it is, the part on the right side side of the FMW car driven by the victim E (the aged 34) who was driving on the right right side from the left side of the direction of the defendant's proceeding was shocked with the front part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the victim’s vehicle to have approximately KRW 7,787,831 as repair cost.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving of the motor vehicle as set forth in paragraph (1) without obtaining a driver’s license from the H parking lot located in G at the time of the border border as set forth in paragraph (1) through the J main points located in G at Gyeongsan City to the above parking lot again.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a passenger car specified in Paragraph 1, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E.

arrow