logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.05 2017나2010921
번영회결의무효확인
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following dismissals or additions. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A part concerning addition or height;

A. In the first instance judgment, the term of office of all executive officers shall be the same as that of all executive officers and shall not be renewed for one year, but shall not be renewed for consecutive terms.” The second sentence “from January 11, 2016 to January 15, 2015” in the second sentence “from January 11, 2016 to January 15, 2016 to January 15, 2016 to “from January 15, 2016 to January 15, 2016,” respectively.

B. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the following is added.

E. W, a decision of provisional disposition on L’s suspension of the performance of duties and appointment of acting directors, filed an application against L’s for provisional disposition on the suspension of the performance of duties (U.S. District Court Decision 2017Kahap7), and on June 14, 2017, the application for provisional disposition was accepted, and L’s duties were suspended until the judgment on the merits became final and conclusive, and Y was appointed by the president’s acting director.

C. On the fifth page 5 of the first instance judgment (based on recognition), “A evidence No. 26, 27, D and N’s testimony” is added to the fifth page (based on recognition).

The 5th of the first instance judgment, the 16th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 6th of the 7th of the year

2) However, each of the evidence adopted earlier and each of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged as comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings, namely, the following circumstances: (i) N & D verified that the Plaintiff has a comprehensive authority over its operation, business account management, etc.; and (ii) the owner M&M (owner) No. 101-1 of the instant building as indicated in the Plaintiff’s business registration certificate or lease agreement.

arrow