1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the case being cited or added by the following parts, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which has been dismissed, shall be subject to 15 of the judgment as follows.

Article 9 (1) of the Special Act on the Improvement of Teachers' Status provides that "When a teacher is dissatisfied with a disciplinary action or other unfavorable measure against his will, he may request the Examination Committee to examine his appeal within 30 days from the date on which he becomes aware of such disposition. In this case, the applicant for examination may appoint a lawyer as his agent." According to the above provision, only a person who is a teacher at the time of the request for the examination of an appeal or a person who has lost his position due to an unfavorable measure subject to the request for the examination of an appeal is qualified as a party to seek disciplinary action or other unfavorable measure against the defendant. As seen above, the plaintiff is not currently a teacher, but a person who has lost his position due to the disposition of the non-acceptance of the teacher in this case subject to the request for the examination of an appeal is not a teacher, and therefore, the part of the request for the cancellation of the disposition of non-acceptance of the teacher in this case among the plaintiff's requests for the examination of an appeal should be dismissed. In the end,

B. 1) Additional Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance added the following “Disposition for Non-Admittance to Teachers’ Office” (hereinafter “Disposition for Non-Expropriation to Teachers’ Office”) to the next “Disposition for Non-Expropriation to Teachers’ Office” (hereinafter “Disposition for Non-Expropriation to Teachers’ Office”). 2) Additional Decision (Judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion for addition to the trial), the Plaintiff is the applicant’s qualification, the applicant’s eligibility, and the above claim