logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2020.06.03 2019고단994
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 3, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court's Ansan Branch on September 3, 2019, and the judgment was finalized on the 11st of the same month.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered “D” in the column for the applicant of the application for registration of a mobile phone at the time of permanent residence “C” at “C” mobile phone sales stores located at the time of permanent residence; (b) entered “D” in the column for the applicant of the application for registration of a mobile phone; and (c) voluntarily signed and forged the application; and (d) requested the Defendant to deliver the mobile phone device while submitting the forged application to the person in charge of F. of the victim Co., Ltd. who was aware of the fact.

However, in fact, the Defendant used the name of D to open the mobile phone, and planned to dispose of the mobile phone arbitrarily, and to cover the cost of living, gambling, etc., and did not have the intention or ability to pay the cost of the mobile phone normally.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving a person in charge of the victim company, received one cell phone of 6S mobile phone of 99,900 won at its market price from that time, from that time, and by stealing the name of D, G, H, I, and J from August 24, 2016, forged an application for mobile phone subscription, service contract, etc. by stealing the aforementioned forged documents, and acquired the mobile phone of 9,933,000 won in total by using the forged documents to submit them to the victims.

2. Around July 4, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H, who was the branch of the agency described in the preceding paragraph, stating that “The Defendant would only make the cell phone open in the name of the four mobile phone and not cause any damage to the width.”

However, the defendant, after opening a mobile phone in the name of the victim, arbitrarily disposes of the mobile phone terminal, and then lives, gambling funds, etc.

arrow