(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.14 2019고단828

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.02.14 2019고단828

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2018, the Defendant, at approximately 22:00, hereinafter “C restaurant in Daegu Dong-gu,” called “the victim D(65 years of age) who had fluencing and drinking, was fluencing the width of the flucing,” and went outside of the restaurant, and flucing the victim’s breath outside the restaurant, and putting the victim into the floor on the part of the victim’s body that was outside the floor, and flucing down the victim’s right bridge.

As a result, the defendant added up the right side of 14 weeks of treatment to the victim, abandonment of saves and abandonment of saves.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. CCTV image, telephone recording CD (the defendant and his defense counsel stated that the defendant had falbling with the victim, and falbling and falbing with the victim, but the defendant did not inflict any injury upon the victim by breaking the victim's bridge as stated in the facts charged. However, the court adopted and examined each of the following circumstances, i.e., the victim consistently suffered the injury of this case by consistently going beyond the floor through the investigation agency from this court to this court, following the following circumstances: (i) the victim was faced with the victim, who was pushed down with the defendant, and falbling the victim into the right bridge after cutting down the floor. The victim was unable to move the bridge at the same time; (ii) the defendant stated that the 119 ambulances was transferred to the next hospital upon request of the student, and (iii) the CCTV at the time of this case’s CCTV installed in the scene of the crime of CCTV at the time of this case; and (iv) the victim was submitted as evidence of CCTV at the time of this case’s submission of video recording 21301-136.

On the other hand, the above two images are in this case.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.04.26 2017고정126

-서울고등법원 2019.03.28 2018노3540

-대전지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단4683

-울산지방법원 2013.05.10 2012고정1312

-서울북부지방법원 2017.07.14 2016노2192