beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's assertion from "1. Basic Facts" to "2. The plaintiff's assertion in the reasoning of the judgment of this court in this Court;
3. Until the occurrence of the right to claim damages, the part of the second to 15 is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance other than using a part of the first to 15th and 8th of the judgment as follows, and thus, it is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (excluding the part falling under the Plaintiff’s claim for indemnity related to D’s “D,” which is not the scope of the judgment of the court of first instance). A. From the third to 19th to 4th 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the vehicle’s entry into the instant vehicle, which is likely to cause a conflict with booms, is controlled by the entry of the instant vehicle into the instant vehicle or by installing safety signs, or by failing to take safety measures such as informing the vehicle entering the instant vehicle with the entry into the instant vehicle of the progress of the construction. Thus, the entry into the instant vehicle was left alone without usual raid.
“The part” did not install safety signs, safety fences, etc. to control the entry of the instant vehicle into the instant vehicle that is likely to conflict with booms on the access road of the instant vehicle, and did not take sufficient measures to inform the vehicle entering the instant vehicle of the fact that the instant construction is being carried out, so the vehicle access road of the instant vehicle could be allowed.
"I have done so."
(b)the following shall be added between 5th and 13th decisions of the first instance.
A person shall be appointed.
(j) The driver G of the instant vehicle and the person in charge of safety at the construction site of the JJ on the construction site of the instant vehicle was indicted under the Incheon District Court Decision 2012 Godan1256 on April 26, 2012 with regard to each of the instant accidents, and was sentenced to each of the convictions by the said courts on April 26, 2012. The judgment above is nothing more than time.