logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 10. 25. 선고 2018두48649 판결
(심리불속행) 납세자고지서를 수령받은자가 종업원이므로, 적법한 송달에 해당함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2017Nu13996 ( October 31, 2018)

Title

(D) A taxpayer notice falls under legitimate service, because the recipient is an employee.

Summary

(2) The exclusion period of imposition is 10 years since the notice of tax payment was received by the employee, and the value-added tax was omitted by means of preparing a false double contract.

Related statutes

Article 8 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, the exclusion period for the imposition of national taxes under Article 26-2

Cases

2018Du48649 Disposition to revoke the imposition of value-added tax.

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ ○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court 2017Nu13996 ( October 31, 2018)

Imposition of Judgment

October 25, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as

arrow