logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 08. 16. 선고 2018두43149 판결
(심리불속행) 비교대상 아파트의 처분가액을 이 사건 아파트의 증여재산가액으로 본 처분은 적법함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu66451 ( April 18, 2018)

Title

(C) The disposition price of the comparable apartment is legitimate as the value of the property donated to the apartment of this case.

Summary

The market price is not only as of the base date of appraisal such as the expropriation price, public sale price, appraisal price, etc. of the property, but also the transaction price of apartment houses during the evaluation period is recognized as the market price.

Related statutes

Article 49 (Principles of Appraisal)

Cases

Supreme Court-2018-Du-66451 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

O Head of tax office

original adjudication determination

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu66451 Decided April 18, 2018

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal is recognized as without merit under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow