logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.12.11 2015고정699
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2014, the Defendant, on the ground that a victim C (at the age of 21) who had a relationship with the victim C (at the age of 21) who had a sloping relationship in front of the gallon station located in the Geumdong-dong, was able to take away the victim’s cellular phone (at the age of 21) from the victim’s cellular phone (at the age of gallon 2) and took the victim’s cellular phone (at the age of gallon 2) and took the victim’s face, taken the victim’s face, taken the victim’s face, and pushed the victim facing the vehicle parked and pushed the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the cellular phone owned by the victim to be 110,000 won of the repair cost, and assaulted the victim.

2. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, the Defendant: (b) placed the victim’s cell phone message on the wall to the victim’s cell phone (which is equivalent to KRW 500,000 at the market price and Samsung Ggal 2) in order to verify the victim’s contact with another male, and (c) put the victim’s cell phone message on the wall to the victim’s cell phone (which is equivalent to KRW 500,00 at the Samsung Ggal 2).

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's cell phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning C;

1. Second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation report (re-specified report on the date of committing the crime stated in the statement of transmission);

1. A judgment C on the assertion that he did not cause assault and damage to property, such as mobile phone photographs and caps, did not make a statement on the crime No. 1 in the accusation book and the police protocol prepared on the same day. In relation to the crime No. 2, the date and time of the damage was stated to be “on November 5, 2014,” and the damaged place was erroneously stated to be “in front of alleyway near the new distance,” but in relation to the crime No. 1, C had made a false statement on October 4, 2014 to the Defendant.

. 110,000,000

b) the brupted case;

arrow