logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단2210
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million on December 27, 2010, due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), etc. on the part of the Jeonju District Court, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of a military court branch of the Jeonju District Court, on the part of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on the part of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on April 8, 2013, respectively.

On October 23, 2017, when the Defendant was punished for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) more than twice, the Defendant driven Dring MK car from the 1km section of approximately 1km to the 306 high-speed underground parking lot in the same Gu, from the front day of the role-gu in Yak-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.125% among blood transfusion around 01:0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Investigation report (related to the confirmation ofCCTV images and the measurement of driver specific and drinking;

1. Selection of a sentence provided for in Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding the facts constituting an offense subject to the relevant Act and subordinate statutes, such as a written reply to inquiries about criminal history, etc.;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Act on the Reduction of Small Quantity is that the defendant had already been punished several times by a fine due to drinking, refusing to take a alcohol test, etc., and the defendant has caused an accident that leads to eight vehicles parked in an apartment parking lot that he/she resides in in in a drinking condition, and the police who was dispatched after receiving a report was investigated as if he/she was killed in the accident, but the police conducted an investigation as if he/she had been killed in the accident. However, as a result of analyzing CCTV images at the scene of the accident, it was discovered that the defendant's traffic accident, drinking driving was discovered as a result of the analysis of the CCTV images at the scene of the accident, and other various circumstances such as the defendant's age and occupation, living environment, alcohol concentration during blood alcohol level at the time of crackdown, driving distance, etc.

arrow