(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.27 2019가단5299051

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.27 2019가단5299051

용역비

Text

Defendant’s KRW 134,821,711 and KRW 21,985,906 among the Plaintiff, shall be from December 1, 2018, and KRW 112,835,805.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 9, 2014, the Plaintiff (formerly, Co., Ltd.) and the Defendant concluded a service contract “B apartment remodeling project district unit planning alteration and establishment of traffic impact analysis and improvement plans” (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the following content.

The name of service: Article 3 (Scope of Services) - Location: Seoul D Day (B apartment) area: approximately 25,810.23 square meters (including division of shares), the scope of services, the district unit planning zone and district unit planning change (including division of shares), the review of traffic feasibility and the environmental review, and the formulation of a traffic impact analysis and improvement plan: Article 5 (Service Price and Time) of the Act on the Formulation of Measures for Improvement of Traffic and Traffic Impact Analysis and Improvement after concluding a contract;

1. The amount of services shall be set at KRW 90,00,000 (14,000 won): The amount of services shall be set at KRW 90,000,000 for a day when the plan for the alteration of a district unit plan is formulated and the payment period shall be as follows: - Contract and retainers shall be as at the time of conclusion of a contract (15%) - Part payments shall be submitted at the time of submission of a district unit plan (20%) - Part payments at the time of submission of a district unit plan for a district subject to a district unit plan - Part payments at the time of determination by the Urban Planning Committee (20%) at the time of deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee for Traffic Impact Analysis and Traffic Improvement Measures (20%) - The remainder at the time of completion of the contract at the time of the division of 25% and the time of the conclusion of the contract at the time of the conclusion of the contract on July 29, 2014, at the time of the amendment of the first district unit plan for part payments on July 29, 13.

The Plaintiff completed the services by phase in accordance with the instant service contract as indicated below.

C. The plaintiff ①.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2016.05.12 2015가합25284

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.18 2016가합542633

-대구지방법원서부지원 2019.12.19 2018가합53362

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.27 2016가합501731

-수원지방법원 2017.04.25 2016가합83941