1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 19, 2016 to the day of complete payment.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. A. On September 25, 2012, the Plaintiff participated in the capital increase implemented by the Defendant as part of the financing for the financing of high-level Alkina and high-level business for preventing the separation of the secondary batteries. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the preferential redemption of KRW 5,000 with a face value of KRW 5,00,000 with an investment of KRW 500,000 with an investment of KRW 11,990 with a common shares issued by the Defendant. (2) At present, the Plaintiff is currently holding KRW 11,990 with the Defendant’s statement and security. (2) Article 9 subparag. 15 of the Preferred Acquisition Agreement, “The investment proposal (A2) to be submitted separately by the Defendant,” as of the date of preparation, reflects and prepares the Defendant’s business status and plan based on a reasonable and reasonable basis, and did not guarantee that all the investment proposals are false or misleading, and that there is no material omission.”

3) 피고는 위 우선주인수계약에 규정된 진술 및 보장조항 가운에 설비규모에 관한 진술과 보장의무를 위반하여, 피고가 2012. 8.경 기준 LED사파이어 잉곳용 고순도 알루미나의 최종제품인 펠렛생산 관련하여 년 300톤 규모의 설비를 보유하고 있으며, 이에 따라 300톤의 생산준비가 완료되었다는 취지의 투자제안서를 원고에 제시하였다. 4) 그러나, 사실은 원고의 투자 이후로 설비보완이 이루어졌음에도 불구하고 피고의 2013년 생산능력 또한 년 60톤 수준에 불과하였고, 2014년 생산능력도 년 120톤으로 개선되었을 뿐 그 후로도 피고가 년 300톤 규모의 설비규모를 갖춘 적은 없다.

B. Around August 20, 2012, the Plaintiff appears to have accepted the Defendant’s preferential share by relianceing that the Defendant’s facility size was the same as the content stated in the investment proposal as the Defendant explained to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s preferential share on September 25, 2012.