The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and that he did not take part in the contract.

However, the administration of philophones is a serious crime detrimental to the soundness of the society and the nation due to their toxicity, and it is highly necessary to punish them, and selling philophones to others is causing illegal profits, and the nature of the crime is very poor, and it is not likely that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable considering all the sentencing conditions, including the recidivism during the period of repeated crime, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.