The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and his mistake is divided is favorable to the defendant.

However, the court below, however, seems to have determined punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there seems to exist no changes in circumstances that would be different from the judgment of the court below due to the fact that the acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have a significant social harm, such as the commercialization of women's sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and requires a strict and severe punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case repeatedly at the same place without being aware of the disposition of suspended execution due to the same kind of crime even though he had already been subject to the disposition of suspended execution, the crime of this case has been committed over a long period exceeding one year, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the age and speculative environment of the defendant, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it is not unreasonable for the court below's punishment against the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.