1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 7,531,272 and KRW 6,569,424 among them.

1. The defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of collective investment securities investment trading business and investment brokerage business.

On May 23, 1980, the Plaintiff joined the Korea Housing and Commercial Bank and worked until December 31, 1994. On January 1, 1995, the Plaintiff was transferred to the Defendant Company, and retired on May 31, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 5, 6, 36, Eul evidence No. 15, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the application for performance performance rating

A. According to the labor contract concluded between the Defendant and the Defendant claiming the unpaid performance rating of 2011 and 2012, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff an amount calculated by multiplying the basic annual salary and performance rate of 50% (50% performance of a company, 20% performance of a department, and 20% performance by the rate of 20%). The Plaintiff’s achievement achievement rating of 2001 and 91% in 2002 does not exceed 51% in 203, and thereafter 71% in 200. This is either for the Plaintiff’s improper calculation or for the Defendant’s performance rating of 205 x 100,000 won in 20,000 won in 200,000 won in x 1050,000 won in 20,000 won in x 100,000 won in 20,000 won in 20.