Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 10, 2016, the Defendant, while attending a fraternity meeting within "D" located within "D" in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Seoul, around 13:00 on June 10, 2016, provided that the Defendant would not pay the time limit and would have the victim go without paying the time limit.

In order to attract the left hand of the defective victim in excess of the victim, the part of the right side and the part of the 5-day river breath of the river boom in need of approximately 4 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G (for example H);

1. A complaint, a medical certificate of injury, a record of medical treatment, and a report on investigation of a witness;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the issue of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not inflict an injury by causing the victim to take the victim's bags and talking about the time limit cash. However, as stated in the facts charged of this case, the Defendant and the defense counsel claimed that the Defendant did not inflict an injury by causing the victim to go beyond the victim's left hand.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by this Court, comprehensively taking into account the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the victim, from the investigative agency to the time of this Court, is going to talk about the issue of the Defendant and the time limit.

At the same time, the defendant made a statement to the effect that "the defendant got off to the defendant by taking off losses by giving time limit money and getting off to the defendant," and the written complaint stated to the effect that "the defendant's statement on the part of violence, etc. was somewhat below, or in this court, "the defendant was on the right side of the defendant, and it is appropriate to take off losses". The investigation agency and this court stated to the effect that "after the passage of the time limit, the defendant brought about a left hand by the defendant."