A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2020, at around 08:19, the Defendant boarded a C cab operated by B and arrived at the Defendant’s residence, but did not get off a cab due to alcohol. The Defendant reported on 112 to obtain assistance from a police officer, and then requested a police officer, etc. to drive a cab according to the Jeju Dong Police Station E zone located in Jeju Island and get off the cab at the parking lot.

The Defendant immediately closed the taxi door to the demand of police officers for their self-employed Defendant, and did not get off from the taxi, such as hump, hump, hump, hump, etc., and hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, and hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, and hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hum

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each written statement G and B;

1. The application of relevant photographs and investigation reports (the attachment to taxi booms images and police officer block images) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is that the Defendant was punished twice by a fine for the obstruction of performance of official duties, and even if he was punished by imprisonment for 8 months in 2014 and 2 years in suspended execution, the Defendant again committed the instant crime and the quality of the instant crime is not good.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized his mistake, against himself, deposited money for the damaged police officer, and the damaged police officer wanted to take the action against the defendant.

The age, character, character and environment of the defendant, as well as the above circumstances.