beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) KRW 899,268, and KRW 1,253,214, and KRW 1,098,312, are the same to the Appointed Party B.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between us. A.
The defendant is a juristic person established pursuant to the Ordinance on the Establishment of the Local Public Enterprises Act and the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Facilities Management Corporation, and the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the "party to appointment") and the designated parties are the defendant's functional and field workers.
B. Where the Defendant calculated statutory allowances, including ordinary wages, paid to his/her employees regularly and uniformly, the difference between the total amount of overtime work and holiday extension work, night extension work, leave allowance, etc. and the amount of the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff and the designated parties in relation to the pertinent allowance, AL is KRW 1,127,207, 1,687,341, 1,68, 1,631, 1,68, and 1,60,631, and 1,631, 1,000 and the remaining designated parties are as stated in the order.
2. According to the above basic facts, the defendant is liable to pay to the selected parties 1,127,207 won, 1,687,341 won to the same AM, 1,060,631 won, and 1,060,631 won to the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties, unless there are special circumstances.
Accordingly, the Defendant asserts that the difference between the designated parties’ AL’s portion on July 1, 2012 and 8.8.N, and AM’s portion on July 8, 2012, 2012, 8., and 9. As such, the Defendant is not liable for payment due to the extinction of the statute of limitations. As such, the instant lawsuit was filed on December 29, 2015; ② unlike the Plaintiff and the remaining designated parties sent the Defendant a certificate of the content of claiming the payment of the wage (the difference between allowances) to be claimed in the instant lawsuit around July 2015, the designated parties sent the Defendant a certificate of the content of claiming the payment of the wage (the difference between allowances) to be sought on September 11, 2015; NA and AM to the same extent on October 6, 201 of the same year, the aforementioned designated parties did not clearly dispute with respect to the aforementioned wage payment.