Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and two months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 8, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On June 8, 2009, the same court received a summary order of KRW 2 million as the same crime. On September 1, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime by the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 29, 2017, the Defendant injured by special obstruction of performance of official duties is driving Csch Rexroth car under the influence of alcohol level 0.067%, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.067%.

The police officer D, who was under the control of drinking driving, should be subject to the control of the police officer D, who was under the control of drinking driving, so it is difficult to find out the fact of drinking driving, which led to the reaction of drinking by the drinking reduction engine, and the driver of the above Bosch Rexroth car was driven and escaped from the scene.

At around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant suffered injury, such as definite, etc., in need of treatment for about 2 weeks, by the patrolr boarding the above D, which was driven by the above D, from the shooting distance in front of the FF Middle School located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s course and stopped, and was in front of the right side of the said patrolr, which is an object dangerous to stop.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving, and caused the injury of police officers.

2. Around 22:00 on May 29, 2017, the Defendant driven a Csch Rexroth car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.067% from the 10km section to the 10km section around the J apartment construction site to the adjacent road of the J apartment construction site.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police of the defendant in relation to K's legal statement.