beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 79,278,302 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from November 18, 2012 to May 29, 2018.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
(a) 1) B is the bus C around 18:55 on November 18, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”);
A) In the case of Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si Automatic 3 stops in front of a bus stop in the Gu affairs of the Jeonju-si University. The place was driven in the direction of the Gu affairs of the Jeonju University. The place is where the yellow real line center is installed with the exception of the part partially cut. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has the duty of care to safely turn to the left at a zone where the median line passed to the right right and the left turn to the left is cut down. Nevertheless, while the driver of the vehicle is negligent and the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely turn to the left at the left, while the driver of the vehicle went to the right at the right edge of the real line and turn to the left (hereinafter referred to as the “accident in this case”).
2) According to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s impairment of the open frame between the brupt of the brupt, the closure frame of the brupt, damage to the crupt of the brupt, damage to the brupt of the brupt, damage to the brupt of the brupt, and damage to the bruptism of
3) The Defendant is a mutual aid insurer who has entered into an automobile mutual aid insurance contract for the Defendant vehicle (based on recognition). The Defendant is a mutual aid insurer who has entered into an automobile mutual aid insurance contract for the Defendant vehicle (based on recognition), without dispute, evidence Nos. 1, 2, 9, and evidence Nos. 1, 2
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.
C. On the other hand, the following circumstances revealed by each of the above evidence, i.e., the Plaintiff, without using the crosswalk, was involved in the instant accident while crossinging the roadway without permission. At the time of the instant accident, the vehicle traffic was frequent due to the bus stop.