logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가합102280
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s payment order against Plaintiff A, Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on August 8, 201, 201, 2011, tea 11232.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Nonparty E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) received loans from the bank of Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea”) on three occasions as follows:

[No. 1 Loans are 1 loans extended in installments, 2 loans extended in installments, 3 loans extended in installments, and 4 loans extended in installments in business facilities, 500 and each of the above loans transaction belongs to the same kind of basic transaction contract. The term of loans extended in sequence 1 loans from October 13, 2006 to October 13, 2013, 234,000,000 Japan (JYP) for less than three months: 17% per annum; 19% per annum from July 16, 2007 to July 16, 2013 to 30% per annum; 17% per annum from July 1, 2013 to 100, 30000 and 17% per annum from 40% per annum to 300% per annum, respectively.

In such cases, the guarantor may designate a settlement term for the guarantee of service by written notification, and the settlement term shall be 14 days after the date of arrival of the notice, and if it falls short thereof, the settlement term shall be 14 days after the date of arrival of the notice.

It is printed with the same text as "...."

In particular, Plaintiff .

arrow