1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,268,490 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 28,916,740, and KRW 166,250 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 28,916,740.

In fact, the plaintiff is the insurer who provides insurance benefits to the insured under the National Health Insurance Act, and B is the insured of the above health insurance.

On August 15, 2011, the Defendant leased the title C201 (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”) to B, for a deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 280,000,000, and the lease period of August 20, 2013, the Defendant leased the title C201 (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”).

B around 2:50 on May 14, 2013, while divingd in the instant housing, 2013. At around 2:50, two wires are attached to each other, in a state that the flow of a single electric field, which is caused by the emissions of air exhausters, water minutes, dusts, and other exhausters installed on the wall of the string pipe, depending on the surface on which the current flow flows. Around 2:50, as a fire that occurred from the joint line (hereinafter “the instant fire”), the head and the 2 degrees images in the head and the instant item.

B received medical care benefits in medical care institutions under the National Health Insurance Act by the above images, etc.

From July 19, 2013 to August 20, 2014, the Plaintiff paid 29,334,340 won in total as medical care benefit costs for the above medical care benefit to the above medical care institution under the National Health Insurance Act.

Of these payments, the amount of medical care benefits before August 12, 2013 is KRW 29,082,990 [29,334,340 won - 251,350 won (77,090 11,480, 860 11,920];

In addition, on May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff paid 198,500 won in excess of the annual total amount among the 2,165,130 won for the above medical care benefits.

Of these payments, the amount for medical care benefits before August 12, 2013 is KRW 185,00 [198,500 - 13,000 (400 7,900)].

Defendant and B agreed not to claim damages on August 12, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-17, Eul evidence Nos. 1-4, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the occurrence of liability for damages, and the limitation of liability, when damage is inflicted on others due to the defects in the installation or preservation of the structure.