1. Defendant P and Q Co., Ltd. jointly share 100,000,000 won to Plaintiff A, 100,000,000 won to Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From around 2016 to 2017, the Plaintiffs drafted a contract with Defendant P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) in which Defendant Q would be the representative director, stating that “if the Plaintiff pays money to the Defendant Co., Ltd., the Defendant Company would return the principal and pay interest after a certain period of time.” (Evidence A 4 to 18).

B. The Plaintiffs paid money to the account in the name of the S Co., Ltd or the head of the Defendant Co., Ltd. in accordance with the above contract.

C. However, Defendant Company or Defendant Q did not return the principal as agreed to the Plaintiffs, and Defendant Q was in an unidentified state.

On the other hand, some of the persons who paid money to the defendant company other than the plaintiffs in this case filed a claim for damages against S corporation, defendant company, and defendant Q for the same reason as the plaintiffs in this case and received the judgment of winning the entire plaintiff in favor of the defendant company and defendant Q by public notice. The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

(A) Each description of evidence of No. 4 through 18, 27 through 41 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole oral proceedings, as a whole, of the grounds for recognition.

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the claim against Defendant P and Q, the Defendant Company received money from the Plaintiffs through the act of fund-raising prohibited under the current law by deceiving the Plaintiffs, and did not return it in accordance with the promise. Therefore, Defendant Q, which actually operated the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company, is jointly obligated to pay the amount indicated in the order to the Plaintiffs as damages.

3. Determination as to the claim against Defendant R

A. 1) The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant Q established the defendant company and illegally received the money by establishing the defendant company. The defendant Q's assertion 5 (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant R") in the name of the defendant R, who is a woman of the defendant Q.