beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, for two years, for Defendant B, for 10 months, and for Defendant C with prison labor for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on June 25, 2009, the Seoul Eastern District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in six months of imprisonment for fraud, and the above judgment was the same year.
9. 24. Finality was established.
1. Fraud against the victimO by the Defendants and fraud against Defendant A and B P
A. The Defendants’ status and premise-based fact-finding corporation Q is a mining right holder with respect to R, S, and T-Japan mine in the time of Jinjin-si.
Defendant
D Around March 23, 2007, on behalf of U.S., entered into a joint development project agreement with Q & Q Co., Ltd. on behalf of Q & P, and paid approximately KRW 300 million as security deposit.
Since then, Q, Inc., in order to develop the above V-day mine to Defendant D, requested an additional investment to resolve various civil petitions including the written consent of the residents in the above V-day mine, and to obtain the land diversion permission (other than approximately KRW 3,000 of the land in the above S, the land diversion permission was not obtained) and permission for development activities.
Thus, Defendant D shows that around February 2008, Defendant A and B entered into the above joint development project agreement, the mining ledger, and the permission for conversion of approximately KRW 3,000 of the above S located, and the main purpose of the above joint development project lies not in mining development itself but in the supply of earth and stones generated in the process of mining development to the dredging soil of the X complex created at approximately 3,650,00 square meters in the direction of W, and Defendant D had a de facto agreement to supply earth and stones generated in the above mining area to the dredging soil of the X complex. Defendant D had an agreement to deny this part, but Defendant A and B entered into the above joint development agreement with Q as the introduction of Defendant D, and paid most of the investment funds received from Defendant A and Q as the name of Defendant D and Q Co., Ltd.