beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. Around March 9, 2016, the Defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B that “A victim B was accused of employment fraud by misrepresenting Cheongdae from the Young-do, Gangwon-do, with a strong bus engineer for about twenty (20) years prior to the Defendant’s home located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was aware of the fact that “A victim B was accused of employment fraud by misrepresenting Cheongdae from the Young-gu, Gangwon-do, with a high interest rate. If the Plaintiff borrowed the agreed money, the Defendant would not receive the said money, and would have to pay the interest without receiving the money.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not make a false statement in order to borrow money, but did not have received a complaint due to a false employment fraud, who misrepresented him, and did not receive any loan from the neighbors without any particular revenue or property at the time, and was able to repay and pay the cost of living with the loan of KRW 0,000,00,000, and thus, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the loan in agreement even if he borrowed money from the victim as a repayment or cost of living.
As such, the Defendant, as indicated in the attached Table 1 from December 7, 2015 to May 31, 2017, received a total of KRW 84,450,000,000 from the victim by deceiving the victim as such and receiving one million in cash as the borrowed money on the same day from the victim, as well as from December 7, 2015 to May 31, 2017.
B. On October 20, 2017, between 16:00 and 17:30, the Defendant against the victim D, the defrauded made a false statement to the victim D that “F located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government,” and the victim D would purchase the vehicle at KRW 3 million at the end of the due date. The Defendant shall make a deposit within one hour prior to the first-come-come-served order, with a preference to sending KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in lieu of payment.”
However, the fact is that the high-ranking public official who the defendant speaks for is driving a vehicle of high-ranking public official.