logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.09 2015노6443
업무상과실장물취득
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants (misunderstanding of facts)

A. Defendant A remains in a brigade, but the guard was reduced.

at the end of the year in which he was injured by the

18K 2.3 2.3 d. (hereinafter “the gold paper of this case”) made a sale to deduct the transaction details, etc. on the purchase ledger, and made a payment according to the gold price, and thus, it fulfilled its duty of care to confirm whether the goods were stolen.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts by recognizing the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

B. Defendant B purchased 1.2 1.2 money from F, and 14.2 money from the 18 K K Tingle and 0.2 money from the 14 K K Ting (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the gold, etc. of this case”), the Defendant demanded a resident registration certificate to substitute the actual face and face with the face on the purchase ledger, and stated the personal information, date of transaction, item, quantity, transaction value, etc. in the purchase ledger, and asked the purchase ledger for the disposition so that the disposition would be followed, and thus, the Defendant fulfilled the duty of care to confirm whether the stolen goods were stolen.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts by recognizing the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case.

2. That it has gone through a procedure to confirm the identity of a seller when the operator of a room purchases precious metal;

If there are special circumstances to suspect whether a stolen is a stolen or not, or if a more detailed attention has been paid to the nature and type of the purchased product and the identity of the seller, etc., he/she shall be negligent in purchasing and acquiring the stolen product without knowledge of the circumstances, the crime of acquiring the stolen product is established, and whether there are special circumstances to suspect whether the product is a stolen or not, or whether it is a stolen is a stolen.

arrow