beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operates precious metal wholesale and retail business under the trade name of “B.”
Around 12:00 on January 17, 2018, the Defendant purchased 24 k k-packs, k-packs, k-packs, k-bals (total of 7 k money) owned by the victim E (M, 55) who was stolen from “B”, which was found to be a customer, from “B” to the Defendant’s operation in Busan Dong-gu, Busan.
In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in sales of precious metals, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by examining well the details of acquisition of precious metals, the motive for sales, and the price suitable for the transaction price from D.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not confirm the source and details of possession of precious metal by negligence when neglecting the judgment on stolen goods, and purchased the stolen goods from D in total of KRW 1,255,00 for the above 24 k Tacks, hacks, hacks, and hacks (total of seven k hacks).
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Three-time protocol concerning D concerning the interrogation of the suspect of the police, and protocol concerning the interrogation of a part of the police to the accused;
1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not have breached his duty of care in the course of purchasing 24k-packs, booms, and cream (hereinafter “the instant precious metal”) from D, on the part of the Defendant’s assertion on the investigation report (such as purchase data).
the fact that the operator of the goldproof has gone through the process of verifying the identity of the seller when purchasing precious metal.
If there are special circumstances to suspect whether a stolen is a stolen or not, or if a more detailed attention has been paid to the nature and type of the purchased product and the identity of the seller, etc., he/she shall be negligent in purchasing and acquiring the stolen product without knowledge of the circumstances despite his/her knowledge that the product is a stolen, the crime of acquiring the stolen product is established, and whether there are special circumstances to suspect whether the product is a stolen or not.