A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2015, at around 04:10, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that “A police officer affiliated with the D District District of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station D, who performed drinking with Japan, performed fighting and fighting with Japan,” provided the Defendant with his personal information by asking the Defendant; (b) the Defendant expressed that “A police officer was fluencing this son, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor of the said E, fluor, who fluords the fluor of the same global belt, fluor, who fluords the fluor of the said F.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Consideration, radius, the fact that there is no past record of the same crime, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;