logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.08.10 2017노126
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing);

(a) It is true that the victim's face is taken by drinking, or that the victim's face is kniffed with both sides of the victim and the victim's face is knifed to be shot;

B. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment, one year of probation, one year of community service order, 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of fact, the statement made by the victim at an investigative agency (police) is reliable because the content of the situation prior to the crime, the Defendant’s act, the scam and reaction of the victim, and the circumstances after the crime is specific (a). (b) The Defendant was unable to provide tobacco with tobacco by finding the alcohol while drinking, and making it possible for the Defendant to do so.

During that period, the defendant was "F will die, and the width will also be the same."

Along with the end, there was a tobacco smoking as it was, but the Defendant was at one time at the right part of the drinking.

Therefore, I am at the same time when the defendant's right can be applied to the defendant.

Defendant was seated as it is.

In order to replace smokes, the defendant opened a lid by opening a slid from the slid in order to make it possible for the defendant to take the face of food once more.

In light of the face and degradation, the Defendant said that “the Defendant was shot away from the death of the average of the year to be Chewing.”

The person, in the Republic of Korea, runs away in the area of hot spring.

Then, the Defendant was faced with the face by being towed to the fluoral fluor with both shoulder and hand, and being towed to the fluoral fluor by the Defendant.

There was a resistance against the idea to live, and it was possible to escape from the world.

In addition, the defendant submitted a written opinion to the court below on January 13, 2017. The defendant asserted that "the victim's face is not a citizen against the smoked coal," and the victim "the victim is the victim's shoulder."

arrow