Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years and by imprisonment for one year.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A With H, etc. and the same year around March 25, 2004

6. A partial amendment to the terms and conditions of the contract was made on March 25, 2004: (a) adding a seller among the contracts dated March 25, 2004; (b) reducing the sales amount; and (c) reducing the size of some lot numbers among J real estate.

was held.

) The title is 33 lots N,O, P, Q, R, TR, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, L, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AH, AJ, AJ, AJ, AK, Am, AM, ASEAN, AmM, N, AO,J and AS, each real estate located in PP, AR, and AS, each of the real estate (hereinafter referred to as “J real estate”).

A) A sales contract was concluded to purchase KRW 11,139,870,00 in the name of H and twenty (20) and paid KRW 8.3 billion in down payment and intermediate payment. Defendant A borrowed KRW 3 billion from K Co., Ltd. around November 20, 2007, and subsequently, Defendant A borrowed KRW 3 billion from K Co., Ltd., and borrowed KRW 3 billion from H with H, and each real estate located in AGAT, AGAT, AJ, AJ, AJ, AO, AO, and AS is referred to as the title trust of each real estate located in AT and AS (of them, each real estate located in AT and AU does not belong to the J real estate). Defendant A and H were the real estate located in AV, AW, AX, AX, AY, and A in the name of AT in the name of P, AH in the name of each of the real estate located in AT.

With respect to real estate, K Co., Ltd. completed the registration of creation of a mortgage over the maximum debt amount of 3.9 billion won to creditors. On the other hand, H, around March 10, 2009, if it is not possible to cancel the said right to collateral on the land of 10 parcels by March 20, 209, the right to collateral on the land of 10 parcels shall be waived.

Defendant A asserted that he did not prepare a written statement of performance until the third trial date of this Court. However, as a result of the appraisal by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, Defendant A only withdrawn all the arguments related to the written statement of performance as his own, and the progress of the Daejeon District Court 2009Gahap2814 case and the disposal document.