The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is the victim B (Nam, 90 years of age) and female. A.

On January 4, 2020, around January 4, 2020, the criminal defendant injured the victim's reputation by attaching a paper "I ambibly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I ambly, I am."

B. On January 7, 2020, the Defendant, around January 7, 2020, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact by attaching one paper, stating that “A paper written by the Defendant, who filed a complaint for murder with his/her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

C. On January 11, 2020, the Defendant, around January 11, 2020, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact by attaching a paper, “A paper written on the wall of the victim’s residence, on the wall of the corridor, stating that “I can see a person who filed a complaint for murder with his/her father with his/her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

2. The facts charged of this case can not be prosecuted against the victim's express intent of the crime falling under Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim has withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, it is recognized that Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act applies.