logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.15 2013고정256
출판물에의한명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In order to slander the Defendant, on May 29, 2012, the Defendant posted a blade for “D” No. 31, 2012 “D” to the “E Security Department,” and “( Strategy) Police, etc. put in a garbage vehicle with a Fmark’s name by using a permanent photograph and a bruc book containing a brupt name in the name of visitors. (b) The public power of the Defendant was not easy to understand the reasons why the waste was contained in the 22 permanent photo and a brupt of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a waste. (C) On May 24, 2012, the public power of the Republic of Korea went away from the direction of the Director of the G Police Station, and then put the 222 permanent photo and a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a domestic police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Entry of a petition for complaint and accompanying materials (C Newspaper publishing);

1. Investigative report (verification of submission by the G police station - Total recording of the process of vicarious administrative execution);

1. Images of documentary evidence and photographs at the time of this case administrative vicarious execution;

1. Images of documentary evidence and photographs;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to two CDs (produced files video) and one CD (produced files video images);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 309 (2) and (1), and 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. According to the evidence revealed in light of the following facts: (a) Seoul FF Construction Management and its employees loaded the instant subdivisions into the general vehicle of Seoul F, and then the Seoul FF cleaning and employees performed their duties thereafter; and (b) did not carry 22 permanent photographs and explanatory records onto the garbage vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant is led by the victim.

arrow